For bond fund flows, green is gold

Between 1Q16 and 1Q23, the AUM of EPFR-tracked Bond Funds without socially responsible (SRI) or environmental, social and governance (ESG) mandates increased by two-thirds. Over the same period, the assets managed by SRI/ESG Bond Funds saw a 23-fold increase.

As an asset class, so-called “green bonds” have picked up significant tailwinds in recent years, ranging from generational shifts in perspective to the explosion of clean energy infrastructure projects. New indexes have emerged that track this market, major financial firms have been adding dedicated sustainable debt teams and the overall size of the market has grown to more than US $3 trillion.

Chart representing 'Annual flow percentage of AUM for all SRI/ESG and non-SRI/ESG Bond Funds, 2016 Year to date'

In 2022, however, global issuance of sustainable debt fell year-on-year. Higher yields on US Treasuries, questions about the criteria used to designate bonds as green, social or sustainable, and questions about their effectiveness sapped investor appetite for this asset class.

This brings us to the issue this blog will address: What does the ESG tag on a Bond Fund mean?


Birds of a feather?

To answer the previous question, we start by tackling another question. Do ESG bond funds actually behave like each other and differently from non-ESG bond funds? To find out, we performed a principal-components decomposition on trailing twelve-month returns through December 2022.

EPFR’s data team classifies funds as SRI/ESG or not based on the prospectus and, when available, its SRI/ESG rating. EPFR’s monthly flows database also has fund returns. We can combine these data points to model the affinity of SRI/ESG Bond Funds to each other and to their non-SRI/ESG counterparts.

Each bond fund that reported data to EPFR for every month in 2022 can be represented as a point in a twelve-dimensional space, one for each month of returns. We can choose a set of axes for this space so that the first axis captures the most variation, the second – orthogonal to the first – captures the next most, the third, orthogonal to the first and second, captures the third-most, and so on. For purposes of visualization, we collapse this twelve-dimensional space into the top two axes, or principal components, capturing the bulk of the variation, as seen below.

Chart representing 'TTM returns to December 22 Principal-components'

As seen in the above chart, SRI/ESG Bond funds — colored red — cluster together. This means that, from a returns standpoint, they behave similarly. Furthermore, a significant number of non-SRI/ESG lie outside of the core grouping for SRI/ESG Bond Funds.


In for the slightly bumpier ride

Now that we’ve determined a fund with an ESG tag marches to the beat of a somewhat different drum, we can look at what that ESG status means to investors. What, in addition to the non-monetary gain of making a long-term investment in a better world, are those investors getting? Higher returns? Less volatility?

Investors certainly believe these funds offer value. The chart below shows the cumulative percentage flow into bond funds from the end of 2017 aggregated up into ESG and non-ESG buckets. It shows that, in relative terms, investors have favored SRI/ESG Bond Funds over non-SRI/ESG funds by a significant margin.

Chart representing 'Cumulative flow'

Another lens through which funds are frequently scrutinized is volatility. EPFR has a daily flows dataset that provides fund returns. From this, we can compute the weighted average daily return of ESG and non-ESG funds. This then yields the moving twenty-day annualized volatility measure plotted below.

Chart representing 'Annual 20 day volatility'

As the chart illustrates, although periods of high and low volatility affect SRI/ESG and non-SRI/ESG funds alike, the former group is – modestly – more volatile. One explanation for this higher volatility is the longer durations that SRI/ESG funds tend to hold their assets.


The bottom line

In a rising interest-rate environment, this longer duration has a cost. The chart below shows monthly cumulative return from the end of 2017.

Chart representing ' Cumulative return'

Over the past five years, the collective performance of SRI/ESG funds has lagged that of non-SRI/ESG Bond Funds. This matters, as SRI/ESG Funds usually have higher operating costs because of the need to screen potential investments. Once interest rates stabilize, however, the extra duration of ESG funds may stand them in good stead because long-duration assets historically outperform in falling rate environments.

Our basic analysis of the SRI/ESG Bond Funds tracked by EPFR confirms they are a coherent sub-group within the overall Bond Fund universe. But, what they deliver for those that invest in them is not so clear. When classic metrics such as performance, cost, volatility are applied, they lag their non-SRI/ESG peers.

Future blogs involving this asset class will explore factors that do – or have the potential to – improve the tangible outcomes for investors.


Did you find this useful? Get our EPFR Insights delivered to your inbox.

Related Posts

Off the wires: Bitcoin is one year away from a major technical event. History suggests the start of another bull run

Off the wires: Bitcoin is one year away from a major technical event. History suggests the start of another bull run

Bitcoin’s next “halving” is expected to take place in 2024. These events take place when Bitcoin miners have added 210,000 “blocks” to the blockchain leger and are marked by a halving of the Bitcoins that miners get for adding each block. Given the implications for future supplies of Bitcoin, these ‘halvings’ usually push Bitcoin’s price significantly higher, both in the run up to the event and for several months afterwards. This time around seems – so far – to be conforming to the pattern: Bitcoin’s price has risen steadily in recent weeks.

Off the wires: US inflation falls to lowest level since May 2021

Off the wires: US inflation falls to lowest level since May 2021

According to CNN, annual inflation dropped in March 2023 for the ninth consecutive month, and grocery prices fell month-on-month for the first time since September 2020. While the CPI has cooled off – at least temporarily – investors are not treating the news as a green light for the road back to riskier asset classes. With fear far from banished, cash remains king.

When ETF flows confound expectations

When ETF flows confound expectations

From time to time, EPFR’s clients alert us to anomalous flows into exchange traded funds (ETFs) that occur on a specific day and for a specific fund. Given our awareness of these types of flows, and the granularity of our databases, EPFR’s quant team decided it was high time they dove into our ETF database and conducted a systematic analysis of these events.

Better, More Actionable Insights

Let us show you how EPFR can create value for your specific strategy


*Indicates required fields

By ticking this box, you agree to receive marketing communications from EPFR. You can review your email preferences upon submitting this form